History of Love, by Nicole Krauss, is my favorite novel of the year so far. For some perspective, here is my book list.
- Cakes and Ale, W. Somerset Maugham
- The Iliad, Homer
- The Color Purple, Alice Walker
- The Bell Jar, Sylvia Plath
- My Antonia, Willa Cather
- Mosquito Wings, me
- Death Comes for the Archbishop, Willa Cather
- Les Misérables, Victor Hugo
- Counterfeiters, Andre Gide
- The World According to Garp, John Irving
- Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking
- Mosquito Wings, me
- Elements of Style, Strunk and White
- Journey to the End of the Night, Celine
- Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald
- The Quran
- Mosquito Wings, me
- We Are Totally Normal, Naomi Kanakia
- Adaptation: The Shooting Script, Charlie Kaufman
- Romeo and Juliet
- American Beauty: The Shooting Screenplay, Alan Ball
- Alphabet, Inger Christianson
- Richard II
- The Writer’s Journey, Christopher Vogler
- The Torah
- Story, Robert McKee
- Henry IV part I
- King John
- Henry IV part II
- The Orphan Master’s Son by Adam Johnson
- Henry V
- The Militia House by John Milas
- End Zone by Don Delillo
- History of Love by Nicole Krauss
It’s October. Last year, I read 59 books. It seems hard to imagine reaching that number this year. I mean, there’s just no way. I’m okay with that.
I can’t expect to finish every year having read more books than the year before. I know that. I also know that the number doesn’t matter very much. I’m not keeping a book list to punish myself, I’m keeping a book list because I’m sure that I’ll read more if I’m keeping track. I know too that more reading equals better writing.
The 34 books, though, have been pretty good ones.

Henry IV part one has been my favorite Shakespeare play. That’s a surprise to me. I read it a few years ago when I TA’ed for a Shakespeare class, and I thought it was just okay. What made the difference this time was reading the histories in chronological order.
I started with King John, which is irrelevant to Henry (and King John is not as bad as everyone says—there’s the eye-gouging and death you expect from all good Shakespeare).
Then I read Richard the II. Richard the II is a prequel to Henry IV part one, and contains many of the same characters. I thought it was only okay, but it gave me context for the rest of the Henriad. On my second reading of Henry IV part one, I understood characters and backstories, it was easier for me to keep track of everything, and the scenes had much more punch. I loved it.
I appreciated History of Love because it was funny and moving. As I read the ending on the FlixBus, I was fighting back tears. Not only that, History of Love has an unconventional structure—threads with multiple perspectives that merge together as the book progresses. I guess that’s not unconventional anymore, but History of Love manages the multiple threads well—each is interesting, each is full of pathos and well-written.
I could complain that some of the machinations of the plot near the very end felt a bit convoluted to me. (No spoilers, but I’m thinking of the last acts of Bird). That said, I was so moved by the final pages, I didn’t even care. I don’t expect any book to be perfect, I just expect a novel to deliver a killer ending, and History of Love’s ending is killer.

That’s all I have this week, people. I’m always grateful for your readership.
Leave a reply to Wayne Capps Cancel reply